Allen Matkins
ProfessionalsIndustries & ServicesNews & InsightsCareers

  • Professionals
  • Industries & Services
  • News & Insights
  • Careers
  • Offices
  • About
Manage Subscriptions

News & Insights

Blog Post

Montana Is 20th State To Restrict Employer Access To Personal Social Media Accounts

Social Media and Employment Law Blog for California Employers

8.03.15

Recently, Montana became the 20th state to enact legislation restricting an employer’s access to employees’ and job applicants’ personal social media accounts. The new statute prohibits an employer from requiring or requesting an employee or applicant:

  • to disclose to the employer user names and passwords for their personal social media accounts for the purpose of permitting the employer to access those accounts;
  • to provide access to personal social media in the presence of the employer; and
  • to disclose to the employer any personal social media or information contained in their personal social media accounts.

Related Professionals

Alexander Nestor

Employers also are prohibited from disciplining or threatening to discipline an employee in retaliation for the employee’s refusal to comply with a request that violates the new law.

In the context of the employment relationship, the statute does provide some key exceptions, however. For example, the new statute requires an employee, if requested by the employer, to provide their user name or password to access personal social media accounts when:

  • the employer has specific information about:
    • an activity by the employee that indicates work-related employee misconduct or criminal defamation;
    • an employee’s unauthorized transfer of the employer’s proprietary or confidential information, trade secrets or financial data to a personal online account or service;
  • necessary to comply with federal laws, federal regulations or the rules of a self-regulatory organization; and
  • the requested information is necessary to make a factual determination in a pending investigation the employer has undertaken.

Under the new law, employees or job applicants can bring an action in small claims court within one year of an alleged violation to seek statutory damages of $500 or any actual damages up to $7,000.

While Montana’s statute mirrors aspects of similar statutes enacted in other states, there also are important differences, such as the circumstances under which an employer may require an employee to provide access to personal social media accounts. Employers that have employees in multiple states would be wise to take this into account when considering whether a one-size-fits-all social media policy is appropriate for them.

SUBSCRIBE

News & Insights

Manage Subscriptions

Newsletter

Renewable Energy Update

5.07.25

Blog Post

Is A Stake An Unincorporated Association?

5.06.25

Blog Post

Is Delaware Forum Selection Bylaw Binding On Shareholder Who Filed Suit When The Corporation Was Incorporated In California?

5.05.25

Legal Alert

Proposed Revisions to Draft Joshua Tree Conservation Plan

5.05.25

Blog Post

Complaint Need Not Allege Fraud, Misrepresentation, Or Deceit To Be "Based Upon" A Corporation’s “Fraud, Misrepresentation or Deceit"

5.15.25

Blog Post

Another Court Conflates Limited Liability Companies And Corporations

5.14.25

Press, Media, & Articles

In the Dirt: What kinds of assets are investors targeting in today’s shifting political and economic climate?

5.14.25

Press, Media, & Articles

Second Rite Aid Bankruptcy Underscores Importance of Vendor Role

5.14.25

Blog Post

Court: Nevada Allows Controllers To Vote In Their Own Interest

5.13.25

Blog Post

This Texas Case Illustrates Why Delaware Are Choosing Nevada

5.12.25

Photo of mountains with trees and grass in the foreground

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update

5.09.25

Newsletter

Sustainable Development and Land Use Update

5.09.25

Event

Building for the Future

5.08.25

Event

Construction & Development Outlook

5.08.25

Picture of chess piece on chess board

Legal Alert

Is Bullock v. Rivian the Nail in the Coffin for California State 1933 Act Claims?

5.07.25

Blog Post

Issuer Retreats From Racial Share Allocation Scheme

5.07.25

Newsletter

Renewable Energy Update

5.07.25

Blog Post

Is A Stake An Unincorporated Association?

5.06.25

Blog Post

Is Delaware Forum Selection Bylaw Binding On Shareholder Who Filed Suit When The Corporation Was Incorporated In California?

5.05.25

Legal Alert

Proposed Revisions to Draft Joshua Tree Conservation Plan

5.05.25

Blog Post

Complaint Need Not Allege Fraud, Misrepresentation, Or Deceit To Be "Based Upon" A Corporation’s “Fraud, Misrepresentation or Deceit"

5.15.25

Blog Post

Another Court Conflates Limited Liability Companies And Corporations

5.14.25

Press, Media, & Articles

In the Dirt: What kinds of assets are investors targeting in today’s shifting political and economic climate?

5.14.25

Press, Media, & Articles

Second Rite Aid Bankruptcy Underscores Importance of Vendor Role

5.14.25

Blog Post

Court: Nevada Allows Controllers To Vote In Their Own Interest

5.13.25

Blog Post

This Texas Case Illustrates Why Delaware Are Choosing Nevada

5.12.25

Photo of mountains with trees and grass in the foreground

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update

5.09.25

Newsletter

Sustainable Development and Land Use Update

5.09.25

Event

Building for the Future

5.08.25

Event

Construction & Development Outlook

5.08.25

Picture of chess piece on chess board

Legal Alert

Is Bullock v. Rivian the Nail in the Coffin for California State 1933 Act Claims?

5.07.25

Blog Post

Issuer Retreats From Racial Share Allocation Scheme

5.07.25

Newsletter

Renewable Energy Update

5.07.25

Blog Post

Is A Stake An Unincorporated Association?

5.06.25

Blog Post

Is Delaware Forum Selection Bylaw Binding On Shareholder Who Filed Suit When The Corporation Was Incorporated In California?

5.05.25

Legal Alert

Proposed Revisions to Draft Joshua Tree Conservation Plan

5.05.25

View All
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Request Personal Data Information

Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Facebook
LinkedIn
Twitter
Instagram

This publication is made available by Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP for educational purposes only to convey general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this website you acknowledge there is no attorney client relationship between you and Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. This publication should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney applied to your circumstances. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Full Disclaimer