News & Insights
Legal Alert
With the stated purpose of reducing “unnecessary litigation” and lowering the cost for employers doing business in California, Governor Jerry Brown, on June 27, 2016, signed into law amendments to California's Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”). The PAGA has been a thorn in the side of California employers since it was enacted because it grants employees the authority to sue for Labor Code violations on behalf of themselves and other employees as a representative of the California Labor and Workforce Development Agency (“LWDA”). Plaintiffs’ lawyers have seized on this opportunity to file numerous lawsuits against California employers over the last few years, often for minor or technical violations, seeking to recover not only available penalties but their fees and costs as well.
The new amendments, which are effective July 1, 2016, aim to give the LWDA more oversight over PAGA claims. They provide as follows:
It remains to be seen how the LWDA’s increased role pursuant to these amendments will impact California employers and PAGA litigation. Some of the amendments, such as the increased cure period, provide obvious benefits to employers, while others, such as the $75 filing fee for LWDA notices, likely won’t have much effect. For other amendments, such as the ones that give the LWDA a role in the settlement of PAGA claims, the impact likely won’t be clear for some time. Ultimately, whether Governor Brown's stated objectives of reducing litigation and decreasing employers’ costs of doing business will become reality is unknown, but at the very least, the amendments reflect a recognition that PAGA claims and litigation need to be reined in.
Author
Partner
RELATED SERVICES
News & Insights
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. All Rights Reserved.
This publication is made available by Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP for educational purposes only to convey general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this website you acknowledge there is no attorney client relationship between you and Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. This publication should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney applied to your circumstances. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Full Disclaimer