Allen Matkins
ProfessionalsIndustries & ServicesNews & InsightsCareers

  • Professionals
  • Industries & Services
  • News & Insights
  • Careers
  • Offices
  • About
Manage Subscriptions

News & Insights

Legal Alert

Securities & Exchange Commission Modernizes The Definition Of "Accredited Investor"

Corporate

8.28.20

On August 26, 2020, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) adopted modernizing amendments to the definition of “accredited investor” in Rule 501(a) of Regulation D (Rule 501(a)) to add new categories of qualifying natural persons and entities and to make certain other modifications to the existing definition, along with changes to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933.  The amendments are intended to simplify and improve private placements, and ultimately expand and promote investment opportunities while maintaining investor protections.  The amendments become effective 60 days after publication in the Federal Register, which has yet to occur.

The amendments to Rule 501(a): (1) add new categories of natural persons who may qualify as “accredited investors” based on qualifications other than income or net worth, (2) expand the list of entities that may qualify as “accredited investors,” (3) add entities owning $5 million in investments, (4) add family offices with at least $5 million in assets under management and their family clients, and (5) add the term “spousal equivalent” to the definition. The SEC also amended the “qualified institutional buyer” definition in Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933 to expand the list of entities that are eligible to qualify as qualified institutional buyers.

Specifically, the relevant amendments are as follows:

  • Modify the “accredited investor” definition in Rule 501(a) to:
    • add a new category to the definition that permits natural persons to qualify as “accredited investors” based on certain professional certifications, designations or credentials or other credentials issued by an accredited educational institution, which the SEC may designate from time to time by order.  In connection with the amendments, the SEC has designated holders in good standing of the Series 7, Series 65, and Series 82 licenses may qualify as “accredited investors.”  The SEC has reserved the right to supplement or revise the designated licenses.
    • include as “accredited investors,” with respect to investments in a private fund, natural persons who are “knowledgeable employees” of the fund;
    • clarify that limited liability companies with $5 million in assets may be “accredited investors” and add SEC- and state-registered investment advisers, exempt reporting advisers, and rural business investment companies (RBICs) to the list of entities that may qualify;
    • add a new category for any entity, including Native American tribes, governmental bodies, funds, and entities organized under the laws of foreign countries, that owns “investments,” as defined in Rule 2a51-1(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, in excess of $5 million and that was not formed for the specific purpose of investing in the securities offered;
    • add “family offices” with at least $5 million in assets under management and their “family clients,” as each term is defined under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940; and
    • add the term “spousal equivalent” to the “accredited investor” definition, so that spousal equivalents may pool their finances for the purpose of qualifying as accredited investors.
  • Expand the definition of “qualified institutional buyer” in Rule 144A to include limited liability companies and RBICs if they meet the $100 million in securities owned and invested threshold in the definition.  The amendments also add to the list any institutional investors included in the “accredited investor” definition that are not otherwise enumerated in the definition of “qualified institutional buyer,” provided they satisfy the $100 million threshold.
SUBSCRIBE

Author

Keith P. Bishop

Partner

Orange CountyT(949) 851-5428kbishop@allenmatkins.com
Email Keith P. Bishop
Download Keith P. Bishop Vcard
Keith P. Bishop LinkedIn

News & Insights

Manage Subscriptions

Blog Post

Broker-Dealers, Investment Advisers And Others May Soon Face Enforcement Under the California Consumer Financial Protection Law

5.01.25

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins/UCLA Anderson Forecast Survey Podcast: Office is Alive

4.30.25

Blog Post

California May Soon Require Owners To Register And Report Commercial Property

4.29.25

Press, Media, & Articles

In the Dirt: Environmental regulatory changes at the federal level

4.29.25

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update

5.09.25

Newsletter

Sustainable Development and Land Use Update

5.09.25

Event

Building for the Future

5.08.25

Event

Construction & Development Outlook

5.08.25

Legal Alert

Is Bullock v. Rivian the Nail in the Coffin for California State 1933 Act Claims?

5.07.25

Blog Post

Issuer Retreats From Racial Share Allocation Scheme

5.07.25

Photo of Century City skyline

Newsletter

Renewable Energy Update

5.07.25

Blog Post

Is A Stake An Unincorporated Association?

5.06.25

Blog Post

Is Delaware Forum Selection Bylaw Binding On Shareholder Who Filed Suit When The Corporation Was Incorporated In California?

5.05.25

Legal Alert

Proposed Revisions to Draft Joshua Tree Conservation Plan

5.05.25

Photo of mountains with trees and grass in the foreground

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update

5.02.25

Blog Post

In More Bad News For Delaware, Nevada Legislature Proposes To Allow Jettisoning Jury Trials For "Internal Actions"

5.02.25

Blog Post

Broker-Dealers, Investment Advisers And Others May Soon Face Enforcement Under the California Consumer Financial Protection Law

5.01.25

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins/UCLA Anderson Forecast Survey Podcast: Office is Alive

4.30.25

Blog Post

California May Soon Require Owners To Register And Report Commercial Property

4.29.25

Press, Media, & Articles

In the Dirt: Environmental regulatory changes at the federal level

4.29.25

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update

5.09.25

Newsletter

Sustainable Development and Land Use Update

5.09.25

Event

Building for the Future

5.08.25

Event

Construction & Development Outlook

5.08.25

Legal Alert

Is Bullock v. Rivian the Nail in the Coffin for California State 1933 Act Claims?

5.07.25

Blog Post

Issuer Retreats From Racial Share Allocation Scheme

5.07.25

Photo of Century City skyline

Newsletter

Renewable Energy Update

5.07.25

Blog Post

Is A Stake An Unincorporated Association?

5.06.25

Blog Post

Is Delaware Forum Selection Bylaw Binding On Shareholder Who Filed Suit When The Corporation Was Incorporated In California?

5.05.25

Legal Alert

Proposed Revisions to Draft Joshua Tree Conservation Plan

5.05.25

Photo of mountains with trees and grass in the foreground

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update

5.02.25

Blog Post

In More Bad News For Delaware, Nevada Legislature Proposes To Allow Jettisoning Jury Trials For "Internal Actions"

5.02.25

Blog Post

Broker-Dealers, Investment Advisers And Others May Soon Face Enforcement Under the California Consumer Financial Protection Law

5.01.25

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins/UCLA Anderson Forecast Survey Podcast: Office is Alive

4.30.25

Blog Post

California May Soon Require Owners To Register And Report Commercial Property

4.29.25

Press, Media, & Articles

In the Dirt: Environmental regulatory changes at the federal level

4.29.25

View All
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Request Personal Data Information

Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Facebook
LinkedIn
Twitter
Instagram

This publication is made available by Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP for educational purposes only to convey general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this website you acknowledge there is no attorney client relationship between you and Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. This publication should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney applied to your circumstances. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Full Disclaimer