Allen Matkins
ProfessionalsIndustries & ServicesNews & InsightsCareers

  • Professionals
  • Industries & Services
  • News & Insights
  • Careers
  • Offices
  • About
Manage Subscriptions

News & Insights

Press, Media, & Articles

Thirty-One Allen Matkins Partners Named to 2014 Best Lawyers in America®; Armstrong and Chine Named "Lawyers of the Year"; Firm Receives Tier 1 Rankings

Article

8.15.13

SAN DIEGO - August 15, 2013 - The Best Lawyers in America® has released its 2014 rankings and Allen Matkins once again received high marks. This year's list includes 31 Allen Matkins partners, including Dwight L. Armstrong and Jeffrey A. Chine being named Best Lawyers' "Lawyers of Year" in Orange County Labor Law-Management and San Diego Real Estate Law, respectively.

Related ProfessionalsView All

Michael L. Matkins

Gary S. McKitterick

Anton "Tony" N. Natsis

Sandi L. Nichols

David L. Osias

Michael C. Pruter

John M. Tipton

John J. Allen

Pamela L. Andes

Keith P. Bishop

Jeffrey A. Chine

Drew M. Emmel

Valentine S. Hoy

Baldwin J. Lee

Nancy Lundeen

Michael L. Matkins

Gary S. McKitterick

Anton "Tony" N. Natsis

Sandi L. Nichols

David L. Osias

Michael C. Pruter

John M. Tipton

John J. Allen

Pamela L. Andes

Keith P. Bishop

Jeffrey A. Chine

Drew M. Emmel

Valentine S. Hoy

Baldwin J. Lee

Nancy Lundeen

Michael L. Matkins

Gary S. McKitterick

Anton "Tony" N. Natsis

Sandi L. Nichols

David L. Osias

Michael C. Pruter

John M. Tipton

In addition to the individual acknowledgements, Allen Matkins received Tier 1 Rankings in the 2014 edition of U.S. News - Best Lawyers' “Best Law Firms.” The firm received National Tier 1 Rankings in Construction Law, Litigation-Construction and Real Estate Law. For the Metropolitan Tier 1 Rankings, the firm was selected in Los Angeles for Construction Law, Litigation-Construction, Litigation-Tax and Real Estate Law; in Orange County for Corporate Compliance Law, Corporate Governance Law, Employment Law-Management, Labor Law-Management, Litigation-Labor & Employment, Real Estate Law, and Securities/Capital Markets Law; in San Diego for Bankruptcy and Creditor Debtors Rights/Insolvency and Reorganization Law, Land Use & Zoning Law, Litigation-Construction, Litigation-Labor & Employment, Litigation-Real Estate, and Real Estate Law; and in San Francisco for Employment Law-Management, Environmental Law, Litigation-Environmental and Real Estate Law.

Individually, partners selected from the Century City office include Tony N. Natsis, Michael D. Ryan and John M. Tipton; from the Los Angeles office, Frederick L. Allen, John J. Allen, Robert J. "Mike" Cathcart, Thomas W. Henning, Bryan C. Jackson, Gregg J. Loubier, Michael L. Matkins and Pauline M. Stevens; from the Orange County office, Pamela L. Andes, Dwight Armstrong, Keith P. Bishop, Vincent C. Coscino, Drew M. Emmel, Gary S. McKitterick, Richard E. Stinehart and Stephen R. Thames; from the San Diego office, Jeff Chine, Valentine S. Hoy, David L. Osias, Michael C. Pruter and Amy Wintersheimer Findley; and from the San Francisco office, David C. Cooke, Bruce W. Hyman, Baldwin J. Lee, Nancy Lundeen, Richard C. Mallory, James L. Meeder and Sandi L. Nichols.

Since it was first published in 1983, Best Lawyers has become universally regarded as the definitive guide to legal excellence. Because Best Lawyers is based on an exhaustive peer-review survey in which more than 36,000 leading attorneys cast almost 4.4 million votes on the legal abilities of other lawyers in their practice areas, and because lawyers are not required or allowed to pay a fee to be listed, inclusion in Best Lawyers is considered a singular honor. Corporate Counsel magazine has called Best Lawyers “the most respected referral list of attorneys in practice.”

SUBSCRIBE

News & Insights

Manage Subscriptions

Blog Post

Issuer Retreats From Racial Share Allocation Scheme

5.07.25

Newsletter

Renewable Energy Update

5.07.25

Blog Post

Is A Stake An Unincorporated Association?

5.06.25

Blog Post

Is Delaware Forum Selection Bylaw Binding On Shareholder Who Filed Suit When The Corporation Was Incorporated In California?

5.05.25

Blog Post

Is This Harvard Magazine Article Incorrect?

5.16.25

Blog Post

Complaint Need Not Allege Fraud, Misrepresentation, Or Deceit To Be "Based Upon" A Corporation’s “Fraud, Misrepresentation or Deceit"

5.15.25

Blog Post

Another Court Conflates Limited Liability Companies And Corporations

5.14.25

Press, Media, & Articles

In the Dirt: What kinds of assets are investors targeting in today’s shifting political and economic climate?

5.14.25

Press, Media, & Articles

Second Rite Aid Bankruptcy Underscores Importance of Vendor Role

5.14.25

Blog Post

Court: Nevada Allows Controllers To Vote In Their Own Interest

5.13.25

Blog Post

This Texas Case Illustrates Why Delaware Are Choosing Nevada

5.12.25

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update

5.09.25

Newsletter

Sustainable Development and Land Use Update

5.09.25

Event

Building for the Future

5.08.25

Event

Construction & Development Outlook

5.08.25

Legal Alert

Is Bullock v. Rivian the Nail in the Coffin for California State 1933 Act Claims?

5.07.25

Blog Post

Issuer Retreats From Racial Share Allocation Scheme

5.07.25

Newsletter

Renewable Energy Update

5.07.25

Blog Post

Is A Stake An Unincorporated Association?

5.06.25

Blog Post

Is Delaware Forum Selection Bylaw Binding On Shareholder Who Filed Suit When The Corporation Was Incorporated In California?

5.05.25

Blog Post

Is This Harvard Magazine Article Incorrect?

5.16.25

Blog Post

Complaint Need Not Allege Fraud, Misrepresentation, Or Deceit To Be "Based Upon" A Corporation’s “Fraud, Misrepresentation or Deceit"

5.15.25

Blog Post

Another Court Conflates Limited Liability Companies And Corporations

5.14.25

Press, Media, & Articles

In the Dirt: What kinds of assets are investors targeting in today’s shifting political and economic climate?

5.14.25

Press, Media, & Articles

Second Rite Aid Bankruptcy Underscores Importance of Vendor Role

5.14.25

Blog Post

Court: Nevada Allows Controllers To Vote In Their Own Interest

5.13.25

Blog Post

This Texas Case Illustrates Why Delaware Are Choosing Nevada

5.12.25

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update

5.09.25

Newsletter

Sustainable Development and Land Use Update

5.09.25

Event

Building for the Future

5.08.25

Event

Construction & Development Outlook

5.08.25

Legal Alert

Is Bullock v. Rivian the Nail in the Coffin for California State 1933 Act Claims?

5.07.25

Blog Post

Issuer Retreats From Racial Share Allocation Scheme

5.07.25

Newsletter

Renewable Energy Update

5.07.25

Blog Post

Is A Stake An Unincorporated Association?

5.06.25

Blog Post

Is Delaware Forum Selection Bylaw Binding On Shareholder Who Filed Suit When The Corporation Was Incorporated In California?

5.05.25

View All
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Request Personal Data Information

Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Facebook
LinkedIn
Twitter
Instagram

This publication is made available by Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP for educational purposes only to convey general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this website you acknowledge there is no attorney client relationship between you and Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. This publication should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney applied to your circumstances. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Full Disclaimer