News & Insights
Press, Media, & Articles
Daily Journal (February 4, 2022) Acting on a request from organizations for developers, the 4thDistrict Court of Appeals has published a ruling from 2018 that found a state law aimed at forcing cities to allow the construction of more affordable housing trumps local control. The case involved approval for the development of the 6th& Olive project, a 20-story, mixed-use building with 204 dwelling units in the Bankers Hill neighborhood near downtown San Diego. The court found that “the Project is consistent with the applicable policies found in the General Plan, Uptown Community Plan, and Land Development Code. Moreover, even if the Project is inconsistent with the standards set forth in those plans, the City was nevertheless compelled to approve the Project under the Density Bonus Law 34”
Related Professionals
The Bankers Hill decision provides supplemental guidance to local agencies reviewing Density Bonus Law projects. Prior to this, the Wollmer decision referenced in the opinion was the only substantive holding available to public agencies and developers,” explained Heather S. Riley, a partner at Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis, who represented Greystar (the project developer). Read More (subscription required)
News & Insights
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. All Rights Reserved.
This publication is made available by Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP for educational purposes only to convey general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this website you acknowledge there is no attorney client relationship between you and Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. This publication should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney applied to your circumstances. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Full Disclaimer