Allen Matkins
ProfessionalsIndustries & ServicesNews & InsightsCareers

  • Professionals
  • Industries & Services
  • News & Insights
  • Careers
  • Offices
  • About
Manage Subscriptions

News & Insights

Legal Alert

After Foreclosure, New Owners Must Perfect Title Before Serving a Three-Day Notice to Quit

Real Estate

12.18.18

On December 17, 2018, in Dr. Leevil, LLC v. Westlake Health Care Center, (2018 S.O.S. 5945), the California Supreme Court addressed a split in authority on the issue of when a new owner, who has acquired title to property after a trustee's sale, may serve a three-day written notice to quit on a tenant. The Supreme Court, reversing the Second District Court of Appeal, determined that the new owner must perfect title by recording a trustee's deed upon sale before serving a three-day notice on the tenant.

In the underlying case, Dr. Leevil, LLC (Dr. Leevil) bought a promissory note and deed of trust, commenced nonjudicial foreclosure, and acquired the property via credit bid at the foreclosure sale. After the sale was concluded but before the trustee's deed upon sale was recorded, Dr. Leevil served a three-day notice to quit on the tenant occupying the property, which was in default under its lease. When the tenant failed to vacate the property, Dr. Leevil filed an unlawful detainer complaint and obtained a judgment. The tenant appealed, and the Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment, finding that Dr. Leevil had complied with the requirements of Code of Civil Procedure § 1161a(b) ("Section 1161a(b)").

Section 1161a(b) identifies the circumstances under which a person in possession of real property may be removed therefrom, one of which is "[w]here the property has been sold in accordance with Section 2924 of the Civil Code, under a power of sale contained in a deed of trust … and the title under the sale has been duly perfected." The Second District Court of Appeal interpreted Section 1161a(b) to allow a post-foreclosure owner to serve a three-day notice to quit before perfecting title if the trustee's deed is recorded before the owner filed an unlawful detainer action. The Court of Appeal reasoned that as long as title had been perfected before the action to remove the tenant was filed, compliance with the statute was achieved.

The Supreme Court took a different view. It interpreted Section 1161a(b) to require perfection of title as a condition precedent before the new owner was entitled to commence the removal process through service of the three-day notice. In reaching its conclusion, the Supreme Court found that, among other things, its interpretation of the statute eliminated a tenant's potential uncertainty concerning whether the new owner validly held title and was authorized to serve the three-day notice.

Takeaway. After successfully bidding for a property at foreclosure, new owners should have the trustee's deed recorded as soon as possible and make sure they verify it has been recorded before serving a three-day notice to quit.

SUBSCRIBE

Author

Michael R. Farrell

Partner

Los AngelesT(213) 955-5527mfarrell@allenmatkins.com
Email Michael R. Farrell
Download Michael R. Farrell Vcard
Michael R. Farrell LinkedIn

RELATED SERVICES

  • Real Estate Disputes

News & Insights

Manage Subscriptions

Legal Alert

California Court of Appeal Clarifies Critical Homeowner Bill of Rights Satisfaction Requirement

12.12.18

Legal Alert

Appellate Decision Underscores Title Review as Critical to Lien Priority

12.03.18

Picture of chess piece on chess board

Press, Media, & Articles

Judge May Soon Order Encinitas to Comply With State Housing Law

11.16.18

Press, Media, & Articles

Encinitas Faces Court Order, Assuming Measure U Failed

11.14.18

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins Prevails in High-Stakes Leasing Dispute Against Mission Housing

3.04.25

Press, Media, & Articles

Big Lots Sale to Nexus Falls Apart, Plans to Close Business

12.19.24

Picture of chess piece on chess board

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins Receives Top Rankings from Benchmark Litigation US 2025

10.09.24

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins Elects Six Lawyers to Partnership

7.01.24

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins Team Secures a Complete $15 million Defense Verdict Following a Five-Week Jury Trial

10.14.22

Legal Alert

Allen Matkins Partners Scott Leipzig and Tim Hsu Prevail in Arbitration Concerning a Buyer’s Right to Terminate a Purchase Agreement and Recover its Deposit Following COVID-19 Disruptions

1.14.21

Picture of chess piece on chess board

Press, Media, & Articles

Next Generation Honoree: Allen Matkins’ Timothy Hutter Fights for Affordable Housing, Historic Preservation

8.15.19

Legal Alert

Assessing When a Discounted Payoff Agreement Becomes an Unenforceable Penalty

3.20.19

Legal Alert

Ninth Circuit's Definition Of "Consumer Reporting Agency" Will Help Lenders Stay Compliant, But Dissent May Presage Future Litigation

2.21.19

Press, Media, & Articles

State Law Prevails Over Slow-Growth Vote in Encinitas

12.24.18

Picture of chess piece on chess board

Legal Alert

After Foreclosure, New Owners Must Perfect Title Before Serving a Three-Day Notice to Quit

12.18.18

Legal Alert

Reverse Veil Piercing May Be Used to Reach an LLC's Assets

12.13.18

Legal Alert

California Court of Appeal Clarifies Critical Homeowner Bill of Rights Satisfaction Requirement

12.12.18

Legal Alert

Appellate Decision Underscores Title Review as Critical to Lien Priority

12.03.18

Picture of chess piece on chess board

Press, Media, & Articles

Judge May Soon Order Encinitas to Comply With State Housing Law

11.16.18

Press, Media, & Articles

Encinitas Faces Court Order, Assuming Measure U Failed

11.14.18

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins Prevails in High-Stakes Leasing Dispute Against Mission Housing

3.04.25

Press, Media, & Articles

Big Lots Sale to Nexus Falls Apart, Plans to Close Business

12.19.24

Picture of chess piece on chess board

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins Receives Top Rankings from Benchmark Litigation US 2025

10.09.24

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins Elects Six Lawyers to Partnership

7.01.24

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins Team Secures a Complete $15 million Defense Verdict Following a Five-Week Jury Trial

10.14.22

Legal Alert

Allen Matkins Partners Scott Leipzig and Tim Hsu Prevail in Arbitration Concerning a Buyer’s Right to Terminate a Purchase Agreement and Recover its Deposit Following COVID-19 Disruptions

1.14.21

Picture of chess piece on chess board

Press, Media, & Articles

Next Generation Honoree: Allen Matkins’ Timothy Hutter Fights for Affordable Housing, Historic Preservation

8.15.19

Legal Alert

Assessing When a Discounted Payoff Agreement Becomes an Unenforceable Penalty

3.20.19

Legal Alert

Ninth Circuit's Definition Of "Consumer Reporting Agency" Will Help Lenders Stay Compliant, But Dissent May Presage Future Litigation

2.21.19

Press, Media, & Articles

State Law Prevails Over Slow-Growth Vote in Encinitas

12.24.18

Picture of chess piece on chess board

Legal Alert

After Foreclosure, New Owners Must Perfect Title Before Serving a Three-Day Notice to Quit

12.18.18

Legal Alert

Reverse Veil Piercing May Be Used to Reach an LLC's Assets

12.13.18

Legal Alert

California Court of Appeal Clarifies Critical Homeowner Bill of Rights Satisfaction Requirement

12.12.18

Legal Alert

Appellate Decision Underscores Title Review as Critical to Lien Priority

12.03.18

Picture of chess piece on chess board

Press, Media, & Articles

Judge May Soon Order Encinitas to Comply With State Housing Law

11.16.18

Press, Media, & Articles

Encinitas Faces Court Order, Assuming Measure U Failed

11.14.18

View All
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Request Personal Data Information

Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Facebook
LinkedIn
Twitter
Instagram

This publication is made available by Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP for educational purposes only to convey general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this website you acknowledge there is no attorney client relationship between you and Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. This publication should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney applied to your circumstances. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Full Disclaimer