News & Insights
Legal Alert
The Fourth District of the California Court of Appeal (Riverside Division) recently issued an opinion in Bruni v. Didion, Case No. E040946, and Alvarado v. Didion, et al., Case No. E041120, in which it refused to enforce a home developer's arbitration clauses. The court found that enforcement would be unfair to the homebuyers based on the presentation and content of the clauses.
Arbitration clause Do's and Don'ts
Following these guidelines will increase the possibility that an arbitration clause will be enforced, especially in a consumer lawsuit or similar litigation against a less sophisticated party. Although the Bruni case involved a developer and homebuyers, the same principles apply to any case involving a more sophisticated party, such as a landlord or seller, seeking to enforce an arbitration clause against a less sophisticated party, such as a tenant or consumer.
Author
Partner
RELATED INDUSTRIES
News & Insights
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. All Rights Reserved.
This publication is made available by Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP for educational purposes only to convey general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this website you acknowledge there is no attorney client relationship between you and Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. This publication should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney applied to your circumstances. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Full Disclaimer