News & Insights
Legal Alert
Recent Amendments to the Surplus Land Act
The following is a summary of (i) the general procedural requirements for the disposal of surplus land by a local agency under the Surplus Land Act (SLA) (Gov. Code § 54220 et. seq.) and (ii) recent key amendments to the SLA. The California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) has issued draft updated SLA Guidelines to address these and other recent amendments.
Originally enacted in 1968, the SLA requires local agencies to prioritize affordable housing, as well as parks and open space, when disposing of surplus land, which is defined as “land owned in fee simple by any local agency for which the local agency’s governing body takes formal action in a regular public meeting declaring that the land is surplus and is not necessary for the agency’s use.” (Gov. Code § 54221(b)(1).)
The SLA was significantly amended in 2020 by Assembly Bill No. 1486 (among other amendments) to specifically exclude property disposed for the generation of revenue: “Property disposed of for the sole purpose of investment or generation of revenue shall not be considered necessary for the agency’s use” ("2020 SLA Amendment"). (Gov. Code § 54221(c)(2)(A).) This makes it more likely that the property will be deemed surplus land under the SLA.
Surplus land owned by a local agency must be designated as “surplus land” or “exempt surplus land” before the property is disposed (i.e., the sale or lease of land for more than 15 years).
If property is declared (non-exempt) surplus land, the local agency is required to follow the notice and open bidding procedures in the SLA. To summarize:
“Exempt surplus land” is surplus land that is formally declared exempt from the procedural public notice and bidding requirements under the SLA because it meets one or more criteria under Government Code Section 54221(f)(1) to qualify for an exemption, which are limited in scope but have been expanded by the recent legislative amendments discussed below.
The California legislature passed, and Governor Newsom approved, several bills (Senate Bill 747, Assembly Bill 480 and Assembly Bill 1734) amending the SLA during the 2023-2024 legislative session (“Recent Amendments”). The Recent Amendments clarify important definitions, include additional exemptions, amend procedural requirements, and strengthen oversight and enforcement by HCD. The key amendments to the SLA are summarized below.
The Recent Amendments modify the following SLA exemptions:
The Recent Amendments create new categories of “exempt” surplus land, including:
The 2020 SLA Amendment provides that an exclusive negotiating agreement (ENA) or legally binding agreement to dispose of property entered into on or before September 30, 2019 is not subject to the 2020 version of the SLA, provided the disposition of property was completed by December 31, 2022. In other words, under that circumstance, surplus land disposed of for the sole purpose of investment or generation of revenue would still be considered necessary for the “agency’s use” and therefore, the property could be deemed non-surplus land. The Recent Amendments (Gov. Code § 54234(a), (d)):
The Recent Amendments provide that a local agency may declare certain exemptions without a public hearing, if it instead publishes a notice and makes it available for public comment at least 30 days before the exemption takes effect. (Gov. Code § 54221(b)(4).)
Under the SLA, an entity proposing to use surplus land for affordable housing must record a covenant on the property agreeing to make available at least 25% of the total number of units available at an affordable cost to lower income households for a specified period. The Recent Amendments vary the affordability period based on the type of housing. The affordable housing units must be made available at an affordable housing cost for a period of 55 years for rental housing, 45 years for ownership housing, and 50 years for rental or ownership housing on tribal trust lands. (Gov. Code § 54222.5.)
Please note that in addition to the new exemptions summarized above, there are pre-existing surplus land exemptions for 100% affordable housing projects with other specified affordability requirements.
The Recent Amendments impose an additional requirement on a local agency that has received a notification of violation (NOV) from HCD regarding the disposal of surplus land. A local agency must hold an open public meeting to evaluate the NOV and is prohibited from approving the proposed disposal of surplus land until the meeting has occurred. (Gov. Code § 54230.7.) In Orange County jurisdictions specifically, a local agency having received a NOV cannot dispose of the surplus land until HCD affirmatively determines compliance with the SLA. (Gov. Code § 54230.8.)
The Recent Amendments revise the penalty fee for SLA violations to 30% of the applicable “disposition value” (versus final sale price) for a first-time violation and 50% for subsequent violations. In the case of a sale, the applicable disposition value is defined as the greater of the final sale price of the land or the fair market value of the surplus land at the time of sale. In the case of a lease, the applicable disposition value is the discounted net present value of the fair market value of the lease as of the date the lease was entered into. The Recent Amendments also prohibit penalty fees for non-substantive violations (e.g., clerical errors) that do not impact the availability or construction of housing affordable to lower income households or the ultimate disposition of the land, as specified. (Gov. Code § 54230.5(a).)
The following are a few key changes in the draft updated HCD SLA Guidelines:
Only land used in “its entirety” by a local agency for an “agency’s use” will qualify as non-surplus land, even if revenue generated on the portion of land not being used according to that definition would support the development on the qualifying portion of land. Under that scenario, it will be important to factor in the type of local agency.
Recall that for most local agencies, pursuant to the 2020 SLA Amendment, property disposed of for the purpose of investment or generation of revenue shall not be considered necessary for the “agency’s use.” However, there is a carve-out for a local agency that is a non-transportation district, in which case “agency’s use” may include commercial or industrial uses or activities, including nongovernmental retail, entertainment, or office development, or may be used for the sole purpose of investment or generation of revenue, so long as specified requirements are met.
As discussed above, the Recent Amendments add the same carve-out for transportation agencies. However, that is technically an “exemption” versus a basis for finding that the land is not surplus land in the first instance.
A local agency that plans to dispose of land for “agency’s use” must provide documentation that the land meets that definition to HCD at least 30 days prior to disposition. This requirement would provide for additional oversight by HCD where a local agency has determined that the land is not surplus land in the first instance.
HCD has clarified what constitutes “good faith negotiations” during the required 90-day good faith negotiation period for (non-exempt) surplus land, as applicable. The local agency must: (i) make serious efforts to meet at reasonable times to attempt to reach an agreement, (ii) respond to letters of interest, (iii) respond to and consider reasonable offers to purchase or lease, (iv) not require that development proposals significantly deviate from the NOA, and (v) not arbitrarily end active negotiations after the 90-day good faith negotiation period.
If the surplus land is located in one of the following four locations, the NOA must be for open space purposes and the local agency is permitted, but not required, to send the NOA to affordable housing providers: (i) the coastal zone; (ii) adjacent to a historical unit of the State Parks System; (iii) listed on, or determined to be eligible for listing on, the National Register of Historic Places; and (iv) within the Lake Tahoe region. The NOA must be sent to the following agencies: (i) any park or recreation department of any city or county, as applicable, within which the surplus land is located, (ii) any regional park authority having jurisdiction within the area, and (iii) the State Resources Agency. (Gov. Code § 54222(b).)
The SLA provides: “The failure by a local agency to comply with this article shall not invalidate the transfer or conveyance of real property to a purchaser or encumbrancer for value.” (Gov. Code § 54230.6.) However, HCD has clarified that it may seek to enforce the SLA and pursue all applicable legal and equitable remedies, including, but not limited to, injunctive or declaratory relief, if a local agency disposes of land, or attempts to dispose of land, in violation of the SLA.
Authors
Partner
Associate
RELATED SERVICES
News & Insights
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. All Rights Reserved.
This publication is made available by Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP for educational purposes only to convey general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this website you acknowledge there is no attorney client relationship between you and Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. This publication should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney applied to your circumstances. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Full Disclaimer