Allen Matkins
ProfessionalsIndustries & ServicesNews & InsightsCareers

  • Professionals
  • Industries & Services
  • News & Insights
  • Careers
  • Offices
  • About
Manage Subscriptions

News & Insights

Legal Alert

New Subdivision Map Act Extension Bill Signed

Information in this alert directly affects all owners of property with a current tentative or vesting tentative map or other entitlements with applicable expiration dates.

Litigation

7.18.11

On Friday (July 15), Governor Brown signed into law AB 208 (Fuentes), which extends for two years the life of those tentative and vesting tentative maps that were still alive on July 15, 2011 (the date the new law took effect) and that would have otherwise expired before January 1, 2014.

AB 208 builds upon two earlier legislative extensions given during this prolonged economic downturn: (1) the 24-month extension granted by AB 333 (Fuentes) in 2009; and (ii) the 12-month extension granted by SB 1185 (Lowenthal) in 2008. With nearly 2,500 approved tentative maps representing nearly 330,000 housing units in California, this measure is significant.

AB 208 creates new Government Code section 66452.23, which recognizes that this extension is available in addition to all of the other extensions (or "stays") already recognized by the Subdivision Map Act (i.e., Sections 66452.6, 66452.11, 66452.13, 66452.21, 66452.22, and 66463.5). So, for example, even if a tentative map qualifies for the new 24-month extension granted by AB 208, this would not preclude the subdivider from employing the phased final map extensions provided under Government Code section 66452.6(a)(1) and any applicable litigation stays pursuant to Government Code section 66452.6(c).

When calculating whether a tentative map would otherwise expire before January 1, 2014 and thereby be eligible for AB 208's two-year extension, one must include any discretionary extension granted by a city or county pursuant to Government Code sections 66452.6(e) or 66463.5(c) on or before July 15, 2011, and any extensions effectuated through the filing of one or more multiple final maps pursuant to Government Code section 66452.6(a) on or before July 15, 2011. One is not required to count any time that the map's life is stayed by litigation or a development moratorium pursuant to Government Code sections 66452.6 or 66463.5.

Like AB 333, AB 208 includes provisions that change the "one bite of the apple" rules set forth in Government Code section 65961 in two ways. First, it shortens from five to three years the period of time after the recordation of the final map during which new conditions cannot be imposed on a project. Second, AB 208 provides that for any tentative or parcel map subject to AB 208's two-year extension, Section 65961 does not prohibit a local agency "from levying a fee or imposing a condition that requires the payment of a fee … upon the issuance of a building permit, including, but not limited to, a fee defined in Section 66000" [the Mitigation Fee Act]. (Gov. Code § 65961(f).) Thus, a local agency may attempt to impose fees or fee-based conditions during building permit issuance. The "legality" of such local agency efforts would depend on the facts of each case.

If you own property with a current tentative or vesting tentative map or other entitlements, please contact us to discuss whether your maps are subject to AB 208 and how this important new legislation affects the expiration dates of your entitlements. We are also available to discuss any related issues, such as AB 208's impact on vested rights and how to document the application of AB 208 to your existing maps.

For a list of our upcoming Subdivision Map Act Seminars, please click here.

SUBSCRIBE

Author

David H. Blackwell

Partner

San FranciscoT(415) 273-7463dblackwell@allenmatkins.com
Email David H. Blackwell
Download David H. Blackwell Vcard
David H. Blackwell LinkedIn

RELATED SERVICES

  • Land Use

News & Insights

Manage Subscriptions

Legal Alert

Joshua Tree Conservation Plan Remains Under Review

2.25.25

Legal Alert

The CEQ has No Clothes: The End of CEQ’s NEPA Regulations and the Future of NEPA Practice

2.21.25

Photo of mountains with trees and grass in the foreground

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins/UCLA Survey Sees Data Centers as Main Driver of Industrial Projects

2.13.25

Press, Media, & Articles

California Real Estate Confidence Builds: Allen Matkins/UCLA Survey

2.12.25

Legal Alert

Proposed Revisions to Draft Joshua Tree Conservation Plan

5.05.25

Press, Media, & Articles

In the Dirt: Environmental regulatory changes at the federal level

4.29.25

Photo of mountains with trees and grass in the foreground

Legal Alert

Federal Agencies Propose Rescission of “Harm” Definition Under Endangered Species Act

4.24.25

Legal Alert

White House Council on Environmental Quality Releases Draft NEPA Template Following CEQ’s Rescission of Longstanding Regulations

4.22.25

Legal Alert

California Court Clarifies CEQA Tribal Consultation Duties in First Published AB 52 Decision

4.10.25

Event

Unexpected Infill Site Hazard Discoveries – What is Enough Analysis under CEQA?

4.07.25

Ground up view of skyscrapers at dusk

Press, Media, & Articles

LA rental market gets even more competitive after wildfires

3.28.25

Event

California Assembly Bill 98 and the Implications for Infill Development

3.27.25

Press, Media, & Articles

Bradco Companies High Desert Report Publishes "Commission Grants Burrowing Owls 'Candidate' Species Protections"

3.26.25

Event

Water Literacy: Legal Perspectives on California’s Water Supply: Rights, Regulations, and Resilience

3.25.25

Photo of mountains with trees and grass in the foreground

Event

Ports, Tariffs, and AB 98: Navigating California's Obstacles

3.20.25

Press, Media, & Articles

‘Simpsons’ producer’s epic tree house may get the ax after ‘absurd’ fight with city

2.28.25

Legal Alert

Joshua Tree Conservation Plan Remains Under Review

2.25.25

Legal Alert

The CEQ has No Clothes: The End of CEQ’s NEPA Regulations and the Future of NEPA Practice

2.21.25

Photo of mountains with trees and grass in the foreground

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins/UCLA Survey Sees Data Centers as Main Driver of Industrial Projects

2.13.25

Press, Media, & Articles

California Real Estate Confidence Builds: Allen Matkins/UCLA Survey

2.12.25

Legal Alert

Proposed Revisions to Draft Joshua Tree Conservation Plan

5.05.25

Press, Media, & Articles

In the Dirt: Environmental regulatory changes at the federal level

4.29.25

Photo of mountains with trees and grass in the foreground

Legal Alert

Federal Agencies Propose Rescission of “Harm” Definition Under Endangered Species Act

4.24.25

Legal Alert

White House Council on Environmental Quality Releases Draft NEPA Template Following CEQ’s Rescission of Longstanding Regulations

4.22.25

Legal Alert

California Court Clarifies CEQA Tribal Consultation Duties in First Published AB 52 Decision

4.10.25

Event

Unexpected Infill Site Hazard Discoveries – What is Enough Analysis under CEQA?

4.07.25

Ground up view of skyscrapers at dusk

Press, Media, & Articles

LA rental market gets even more competitive after wildfires

3.28.25

Event

California Assembly Bill 98 and the Implications for Infill Development

3.27.25

Press, Media, & Articles

Bradco Companies High Desert Report Publishes "Commission Grants Burrowing Owls 'Candidate' Species Protections"

3.26.25

Event

Water Literacy: Legal Perspectives on California’s Water Supply: Rights, Regulations, and Resilience

3.25.25

Photo of mountains with trees and grass in the foreground

Event

Ports, Tariffs, and AB 98: Navigating California's Obstacles

3.20.25

Press, Media, & Articles

‘Simpsons’ producer’s epic tree house may get the ax after ‘absurd’ fight with city

2.28.25

Legal Alert

Joshua Tree Conservation Plan Remains Under Review

2.25.25

Legal Alert

The CEQ has No Clothes: The End of CEQ’s NEPA Regulations and the Future of NEPA Practice

2.21.25

Photo of mountains with trees and grass in the foreground

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins/UCLA Survey Sees Data Centers as Main Driver of Industrial Projects

2.13.25

Press, Media, & Articles

California Real Estate Confidence Builds: Allen Matkins/UCLA Survey

2.12.25

View All
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Request Personal Data Information

Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Facebook
LinkedIn
Twitter
Instagram

This publication is made available by Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP for educational purposes only to convey general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this website you acknowledge there is no attorney client relationship between you and Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. This publication should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney applied to your circumstances. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Full Disclaimer