News & Insights
Legal Alert
GOOD NEWS: A landlord wins its unlawful detainer case, and the court enters a judgment for possession in favor of the landlord.
BAD NEWS: The landlord finds itself liable for an injury that occurred in the leased premises after entry of the judgment for possession but before the landlord regained actual possession of the premises, despite the fact that the injury was the result of a dangerous condition of which the landlord had no knowledge.
Could this really happen? The answer is yes, because of the decision in a recent California case* in which the court established a new duty on landlords who evict tenants.
NEW DUTY: A landlord has a duty to inspect premises upon entry of a judgment for possession, including reasonable periodic inspections thereafter.
RISK FACED BY LANDLORDS FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY: If a landlord fails to comply with its duty of inspection following the issuance of a judgment for possession, or fails to remedy any dangerous condition that it discovers, then the landlord can be held liable for injuries suffered by third parties as a result of that dangerous condition.
WHY THE NEW DUTY IS A PROBLEM FOR LANDLORDS: A judgment of possession does NOT give the landlord the right to dispossess a tenant – it just gives the landlord the right to obtain a writ of possession and thereafter instruct the sheriff to dispossess the tenant.
LESSON: If a landlord decides to evict a tenant, the landlord needs to be ready to take back possession of the leased premises as soon as the court enters a judgment for possession in the unlawful detainer action. If the landlord waits even a few days to apply for the writ of possession or subsequently delays contacting the sheriff in order to physically oust the tenant and take over possession, the landlord increases its risk of liability to third parties for dangerous conditions at the leased premises.
*Stone v. Center Trust Retail Props., Inc. (2008) 163 Cal. App. 4th 608, 77 Cal. Rptr. 3d 556
Authors
Of Counsel
Partner
Partner
RELATED INDUSTRIES
News & Insights
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. All Rights Reserved.
This publication is made available by Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP for educational purposes only to convey general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this website you acknowledge there is no attorney client relationship between you and Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. This publication should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney applied to your circumstances. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Full Disclaimer