News & Insights
Press, Media, & Articles
California courts may be turning a corner in their attitudes toward alternative dispute resolution. At the very least, the recent decision from the state Supreme Court in Pinnacle Museum Tower Association v. Pinnacle Market Development (US), LLC, et al., S186149 (Cal. Aug. 16, 2012) will provide for enforcement of arbitration clauses contained in declarations of covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC&Rs). Previously, California courts held that such provisions could not be enforced by developers who no longer owned property in a common interest development.
Authors
Partner
Partner
RELATED SERVICES
News & Insights
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. All Rights Reserved.
This publication is made available by Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP for educational purposes only to convey general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this website you acknowledge there is no attorney client relationship between you and Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. This publication should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney applied to your circumstances. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Full Disclaimer