Allen Matkins
ProfessionalsIndustries & ServicesNews & InsightsCareers

  • Professionals
  • Industries & Services
  • News & Insights
  • Careers
  • Offices
  • About
Manage Subscriptions

Environmental & Natural Resources

Contaminated Sites and Superfund

Allen Matkins counsels and represents clients in matters involving the management, disposal and cleanup of solid waste and hazardous wastes, substances and materials under a variety of laws, including:

  • Federal environmental laws, including CERCLA and RCRA
  • California’s Health and Safety Code
  • California’s nuisance, trespass and ultra-hazardous activity laws

We also assist clients with cost recovery, contribution and damages actions in state and federal courts for soil and groundwater contamination under state and federal law (including CERCLA) and assist clients with civil penalty and criminal enforcement actions under California’s Health and Safety Code and federal RCRA.

Superfund

We represent clients who have been named as responsible parties at federal Superfund sites, guiding them through a complex process that typically includes:

  • Receipt of special notice letters and continues
  • Unilateral administrative orders or administrative orders on consent
  • Remedial investigations
  • Development of feasibility studies
  • Remedy negotiation and selection
  • Consent decrees
  • Cleanup
  • Post-cleanup monitoring
  • Delisting
  • Cost recovery and/or contribution litigation
  • Natural recourse damages claims

In addition, we represent clients in connection with unilateral administrative orders and administrative orders on consent under Section 106 of CERCLA and cost recovery and contribution actions under Section 107.

We also assist clients with cost recovery, contribution and damages actions in state and federal courts for soil and groundwater contamination under state and federal law (including CERCLA) and assist clients with civil penalty and criminal enforcement actions under California’s Health and Safety Code and federal RCRA.

Superfund

We represent clients who have been named as responsible parties at federal Superfund sites, guiding them through a complex process that typically includes:

  • Receipt of special notice letters and continues
  • Unilateral administrative orders or administrative orders on consent
  • Remedial investigations
  • Development of feasibility studies
  • Remedy negotiation and selection
  • Consent decrees
  • Cleanup
  • Post-cleanup monitoring
  • Delisting
  • Cost recovery and/or contribution litigation
  • Natural recourse damages claims

In addition, we represent clients in connection with unilateral administrative orders and administrative orders on consent under Section 106 of CERCLA and cost recovery and contribution actions under Section 107.

"Excellent combination of environmental and legal knowledge."

- General Counsel, Oil and Gas Company

EXPERIENCE

  • Major Manufacturer. Represented major manufacturer and related entities in connection with alleged perchlorate and TCE contamination of a Southern California groundwater basin.
  • Major Oil Company. Represented a major oil company in the alleged contamination of a northwestern river for its entire 15 mile course. Preliminary assessments of the sediments in the river has caused some potentially responsible parties to estimate that the remedial investigation of the river itself will cost between $60 and $80 million with the cleanup potentially costing multiples of this number. The client is one of more than 100 potentially responsible parties.
  • Oil and Gas Company. Represented oil and gas company in administrative civil liability complaint for $8.5 million arising out of beneficial reuse of crude oil impacted soils from operating oil field as road mix under Central Coast RWQCB waiver program for waste discharge requirements.
  • Power Tool Manufacturer. Represented power tool manufacturer, a third party defendant and alleged generator of hazardous wastes in long-running litigation in federal district court.
  • Port District. Represented port district in an administrative enforcement action brought by the RWQCB against numerous alleged dischargers to address metals, PCBs, tributyltin, among other contaminants of concern.
  • Mercury Mine Operator. Represented alleged successor to last operator of a mercury mine in Department of Toxic Substances Control-led cleanup and related litigation, in resolution of U.S. Department of Interior and California Department of Fish and Wildlife action for natural resource damages under CERCLA.
  • Water Company. Represented water company in federal court litigation against the United States Air Force, arising out of contamination of a drinking water supply well with pollutants released at an Air Force Base.
  • Food Manufacturer. Represented food manufacturer in negotiations with U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. EPA of terms of consent decree, and with potentially responsible parties (PRPs) regarding cleanup responsibilities, cost contributions, and resolution of claims for contamination and treatment costs by affected water purveyors.
  • Water Company. Represented water company in obtaining comprehensive resolution of water replacement claims arising out of past and threatened future contamination of drinking water supply wells by chlorinated solvents and perchlorate released to groundwater.
  • Contaminated Solvent Recycling Facility. Represented former owner/operators of contaminated solvent recycling facility in regional water board-supervised cleanup and in related litigation in federal court with other responsible parties and indemnitors.
  • Corporation. Represented corporation set up to address chlorinated solvent contamination at former industrial site in Northern California, and litigation in federal district court with other responsible parties regarding cleanup costs.
  • Pulp Mill. Represented owner/operator of kraft pulp mill in connection with regional water board-led investigation and remediation of contaminated soil and groundwater.
  • Port. Represented port in connection with site investigations and negotiations with industrial tenant that has generated PCB, metals and other contamination of soil and groundwater at the site.
  • Water Company. Represented water company in negotiations with regional water board regarding cleanup and disposition of water supply wells contaminated or threatened by releases of perchloroethylene from large industrial dry cleaning plant, and in CERCLA litigation in federal district court against the owner of the plant.
  • Property Owner. Represented plaintiff owner of property with contaminated groundwater in CERCLA action.
  • Site Operator. Represented alleged former site operator in federal and state court litigation brought under CERCLA, HSAA, and state law common law theories.
  • Water Company. Represented privately owned water company in CERCLA action for contamination of groundwater supplies in Sacramento.
  • Private Party. Represented private party in administrative litigation contesting a Water Code §13304 cleanup and abatement order regarding perchlorate contamination of groundwater in Rialto, California.
  • Private Party. Represented potentially responsible parties in administrative enforcement action brought by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
  • Property Owner. Represented plaintiff owner of property with contaminated groundwater in CERCLA action.
  • Mercury Mine Operator. Represented alleged successor to last operator of a mercury mine in Department of Toxic Substances Control-led cleanup and related litigation, in resolution of U.S. Department of Interior and California Department of Fish and Wildlife action for natural resource damages under CERCLA.
  • Water Company. Represented water company in federal court litigation against the United States Air Force, arising out of contamination of a drinking water supply well with pollutants released at an Air Force Base.
  • Food Manufacturer. Represented food manufacturer in negotiations with U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. EPA of terms of consent decree, and with potentially responsible parties (PRPs) regarding cleanup responsibilities, cost contributions, and resolution of claims for contamination and treatment costs by affected water purveyors.
  • Water Company. Represented water company in obtaining comprehensive resolution of water replacement claims arising out of past and threatened future contamination of drinking water supply wells by chlorinated solvents and perchlorate released to groundwater.
  • Contaminated Solvent Recycling Facility. Represented former owner/operators of contaminated solvent recycling facility in regional water board-supervised cleanup and in related litigation in federal court with other responsible parties and indemnitors.
  • Corporation. Represented corporation set up to address chlorinated solvent contamination at former industrial site in Northern California, and litigation in federal district court with other responsible parties regarding cleanup costs.
  • Pulp Mill. Represented owner/operator of kraft pulp mill in connection with regional water board-led investigation and remediation of contaminated soil and groundwater.
  • Port. Represented port in connection with site investigations and negotiations with industrial tenant that has generated PCB, metals and other contamination of soil and groundwater at the site.
  • Water Company. Represented water company in negotiations with regional water board regarding cleanup and disposition of water supply wells contaminated or threatened by releases of perchloroethylene from large industrial dry cleaning plant, and in CERCLA litigation in federal district court against the owner of the plant.
  • Property Owner. Represented plaintiff owner of property with contaminated groundwater in CERCLA action.
  • Site Operator. Represented alleged former site operator in federal and state court litigation brought under CERCLA, HSAA, and state law common law theories.
  • Water Company. Represented privately owned water company in CERCLA action for contamination of groundwater supplies in Sacramento.
  • Private Party. Represented private party in administrative litigation contesting a Water Code §13304 cleanup and abatement order regarding perchlorate contamination of groundwater in Rialto, California.
  • Private Party. Represented potentially responsible parties in administrative enforcement action brought by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
  • Property Owner. Represented plaintiff owner of property with contaminated groundwater in CERCLA action.
  • Related  Services

  • Environmental & Natural Resources

  • Real Estate Services

  • Litigation & Counseling

News & Insights

Manage Subscriptions

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update 

4.11.25

Legal Alert

California Court Clarifies CEQA Tribal Consultation Duties in First Published AB 52 Decision

4.10.25

Photo of mountains with trees and grass in the foreground

Event

Unexpected Infill Site Hazard Discoveries – What is Enough Analysis under CEQA?

4.07.25

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update

4.04.25

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update

5.09.25

Legal Alert

Is Bullock v. Rivian the Nail in the Coffin for California State 1933 Act Claims?

5.07.25

Photo of mountains with trees and grass in the foreground

Legal Alert

Proposed Revisions to Draft Joshua Tree Conservation Plan

5.05.25

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update

5.02.25

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins/UCLA Anderson Forecast Survey Podcast: Office is Alive

4.30.25

Press, Media, & Articles

In the Dirt: Environmental regulatory changes at the federal level

4.29.25

Picture of chess piece on chess board

Press, Media, & Articles

Landlord Sues Contractors Over $130M Lead, Asbestos at San Francisco Office Property

4.29.25

Newsletter

Special Water Supply Edition: California Environmental Law & Policy Update

4.25.25

Legal Alert

Federal Agencies Propose Rescission of “Harm” Definition Under Endangered Species Act

4.24.25

Legal Alert

White House Council on Environmental Quality Releases Draft NEPA Template Following CEQ’s Rescission of Longstanding Regulations

4.22.25

Photo of mountains with trees and grass in the foreground

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update

4.18.25

Press, Media, & Articles

In the Dirt: What is the outlook for the office sector right now?

4.15.25

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update 

4.11.25

Legal Alert

California Court Clarifies CEQA Tribal Consultation Duties in First Published AB 52 Decision

4.10.25

Photo of mountains with trees and grass in the foreground

Event

Unexpected Infill Site Hazard Discoveries – What is Enough Analysis under CEQA?

4.07.25

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update

4.04.25

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update

5.09.25

Legal Alert

Is Bullock v. Rivian the Nail in the Coffin for California State 1933 Act Claims?

5.07.25

Photo of mountains with trees and grass in the foreground

Legal Alert

Proposed Revisions to Draft Joshua Tree Conservation Plan

5.05.25

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update

5.02.25

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins/UCLA Anderson Forecast Survey Podcast: Office is Alive

4.30.25

Press, Media, & Articles

In the Dirt: Environmental regulatory changes at the federal level

4.29.25

Picture of chess piece on chess board

Press, Media, & Articles

Landlord Sues Contractors Over $130M Lead, Asbestos at San Francisco Office Property

4.29.25

Newsletter

Special Water Supply Edition: California Environmental Law & Policy Update

4.25.25

Legal Alert

Federal Agencies Propose Rescission of “Harm” Definition Under Endangered Species Act

4.24.25

Legal Alert

White House Council on Environmental Quality Releases Draft NEPA Template Following CEQ’s Rescission of Longstanding Regulations

4.22.25

Photo of mountains with trees and grass in the foreground

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update

4.18.25

Press, Media, & Articles

In the Dirt: What is the outlook for the office sector right now?

4.15.25

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update 

4.11.25

Legal Alert

California Court Clarifies CEQA Tribal Consultation Duties in First Published AB 52 Decision

4.10.25

Photo of mountains with trees and grass in the foreground

Event

Unexpected Infill Site Hazard Discoveries – What is Enough Analysis under CEQA?

4.07.25

Newsletter

California Environmental Law & Policy Update

4.04.25

  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Request Personal Data Information

Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Facebook
LinkedIn
Twitter
Instagram

This publication is made available by Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP for educational purposes only to convey general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this website you acknowledge there is no attorney client relationship between you and Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. This publication should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney applied to your circumstances. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Full Disclaimer