Education
J.D., University of Virginia School of Law
B.A., Princeton University
Bar Admissions
California
Jacob is a senior counsel in the San Francisco office and a member of the Land Use, Environmental, and Natural Resources practice. He counsels developers on issues arising under federal, state, and local environmental and land use laws, including the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), California Planning and Zoning Law, National Historic Preservation Act, Clean Water Act, and federal and state Endangered Species Acts. Jacob also has extensive experience defending project entitlements and private property rights in litigation.
Jacob has advised private developers and public agencies on a wide range of infrastructure and commercial real estate projects, including energy (solar, wind, battery storage, transmission), transportation (rail, transit, highway, maritime port), water resources, telecommunications, multifamily housing, retail, and hospitality/leisure.
Before joining Allen Matkins, Jacob was counsel at an international law firm. During law school, Jacob served as a clerk with the U.S. Department of Justice’s Environment and Natural Resources Division.
Jacob has advised private developers and public agencies on a wide range of infrastructure and commercial real estate projects, including energy (solar, wind, battery storage, transmission), transportation (rail, transit, highway, maritime port), water resources, telecommunications, multifamily housing, retail, and hospitality/leisure.
Before joining Allen Matkins, Jacob was counsel at an international law firm. During law school, Jacob served as a clerk with the U.S. Department of Justice’s Environment and Natural Resources Division.
California High-Speed Rail System. Advised the California High-Speed Rail Authority on compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act and other federal environmental laws for the high-speed rail system between San Francisco and Los Angeles/Anaheim.*
Solar Energy Project. Advised a developer of a solar energy project on private and federal land in Kern County, California, on compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, National Environmental Policy Act, and California Endangered Species Act.*
Affordable Housing Development. Advised The Kelsey on an entitlement strategy for an eight-story, 109-unit 100% affordable housing development in San Francisco’s Civic Center neighborhood, with a quarter of the apartments reserved for residents with disabilities. The project successfully took advantage of the state density bonus law and the streamlined approval process created by SB 35.*
Great Wolf Lodge. Represented Great Wolf Resorts in a public-private partnership to develop a destination family resort with a 500-room hotel and indoor water park in Manteca, California. Representation included negotiating and drafting agreements to vest city entitlements, resolving real estate matters, advising on compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and other environmental laws, and obtaining natural resource permits from state and regional agencies.*
Telecommunications Facilities. Advised a telecommunications company on obtaining approvals to place infrastructure on federal lands under jurisdiction of the Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, and Bureau of Reclamation.*
Broadband Infrastructure. Assisted a telecommunications company with applying for grants from the California Public Utilities Commission to expand broadband internet to unserved areas, including advising on compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act.*
Maacama Watershed Alliance v. Sonoma County. Represented Knights Bridge Vineyards in a lawsuit challenging the mitigated negative declaration and entitlements to develop a new winery, involving claims under the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Planning and Zoning Law.*
Helicopters For Agriculture v. Napa County. Represented vineyard and winery owners in a federal lawsuit challenging as unconstitutional in an initiative ordinance that restricted the use of helicopters for agricultural activities.*
Conserve Southwest Utah v. U.S. Bureau of Land Management. Represented the Utah Department of Transportation in litigation challenging a federal right-of-way grant for the Northern Corridor Highway near St. George, Utah, involving claims under the National Environmental Policy Act, Endangered Species Act, and National Historic Preservation Act.*
Sauk Prairie State Recreation Area. Represented the Sauk Prairie Conservation Alliance in an administrative contested case hearing and litigation in both state and federal courts regarding the master plan for the Sauk Prairie State Recreation Area in Wisconsin, involving claims under the National Environmental Policy Act and a similar state environmental review law.*
Solar Energy Projects. Advised the purchaser of solar energy projects located in California with due diligence of environmental and land use permitting issues.*
Manufacturing Company. Advised a prospective purchaser of a mechanical hardware manufacturing company with due diligence of environmental permitting and site contamination issues.*
* Matters completed prior to joining Allen Matkins.
California Association of Environmental Professionals
Santa Rosa, CA
10.24.23
Utah Department of Transportation Annual Conference
Sandy, UT
11.05.19
DC Circ. Ruling Adds New Wrinkle To Agency NEPA Reviews
Press Mention
11.19.24
11.15.24
Changes to the California Environmental Quality Act Enacted in 2023
5.23.24
New State Laws to Facilitate Infrastructure Project Development
5.23.24
Significant Changes to the National Environmental Policy Act
5.23.24
New Regulations to Streamline Permitting for Take of Bald and Golden Eagles
4.11.24
Proposed CEQA and Tax Exemptions for Projects in Downtown San Francisco
3.04.24
Keeping Pace: Aligning California’s Phase-Out of Gas Cars with the Charging Infrastructure Required
Jacob Aronson in the Santa Clara Business Law Chronicle
*Article published prior to joining Allen Matkins
Article
1.19.23
‘Had We But World Enough and Time’: Will the Infrastructure Bill Change NEPA Timeframes?
Honorable Mention for the Best Paper Award at the Spring 2022 Conference of the American Bar Association Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources
*Article published prior to joining Allen Matkins
Article
4.22.22
Environment, Energy, and Resources Law: The Year in Review 2018, Forest Resources Chapter
American Bar Association Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources
*Article published prior to joining Allen Matkins
Article
12.31.18
Environment, Energy, and Resources Law: The Year in Review 2017, Forest Resources Chapter
American Bar Association Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources
*Article published prior to joining Allen Matkins
Article
12.31.17
News & Insights
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. All Rights Reserved.
This publication is made available by Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP for educational purposes only to convey general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this website you acknowledge there is no attorney client relationship between you and Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. This publication should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney applied to your circumstances. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Full Disclaimer