News & Insights
Press, Media, & Articles
Law360 (January 26, 2016) The high court's decision to hear an eminent domain case concerning a family-government dispute over adjacent Wisconsin properties suggests the court may believe that, contrary to a state court ruling, takings cases require individual analysis, and a Supreme Court decision could have broad impact on an area that varies widely state by state, lawyers say. "The greatest significance is that the U.S. Supreme Court took up the issue,” said K. Erik Friess of Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. "It indicates they're still interested in these issues, and that we may get some additional clarity. "There's not going to be a revolution but there's probably going to be some evolution in the law," he added.
Related Professionals
RELATED SERVICES
News & Insights
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. All Rights Reserved.
This publication is made available by Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP for educational purposes only to convey general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this website you acknowledge there is no attorney client relationship between you and Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. This publication should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney applied to your circumstances. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Full Disclaimer