News & Insights
Press, Media, & Articles
Property owners in the city of Perris got a break last week when a state appellate panel reversed a trial court's decision regarding the city's eminent domain action against the owners, letting the issue instead be decided by a jury. In the opinion, handed down Friday by the Riverside-based 4th District Court of Appeal, the panel held that a jury, and not a judge, should decide issues that could impact the determination of "just compensation" for the land in question. "It really helps protect the right to a jury trial in eminent domain to important issues that affect valuation," said K. Erik "Rick" Friess, partner with Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP in Irvine who represents the landowners.
Related Professionals
RELATED SERVICES
News & Insights
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. All Rights Reserved.
This publication is made available by Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP for educational purposes only to convey general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this website you acknowledge there is no attorney client relationship between you and Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. This publication should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney applied to your circumstances. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Full Disclaimer