News & Insights
Legal Alert
The economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly the impacts arising from federal, state and local shelter-in-place restrictions, have caused numerous affected parties to submit claims under their insurance policies. These claims assert losses covered by a variety of insuring clauses, from business interruption to pollution to civil authority clauses. While it remains to be seen whether insurers will pay on such claims, voluntarily or not, lenders who have an interest in their borrowers' insurance proceeds should be ready to enforce their rights at the appropriate time. To do so, they must understand the extent of their rights – whether there is a security interest in insurance proceeds, a contractual right to a specific designation on the borrower's insurance policy, or both – and how to enforce those rights.
What follows is a checklist that lenders may use to confirm the existence and enforceability of their interests in borrowers' insurance proceeds.
As a preliminary matter, lenders should check their loan documents to determine the existence and scope of the security interests and contractual rights with respect to insurance proceeds. Lenders should examine the applicable documents to answer some basic questions relating to insurance.
Having determined the extent of insurance protection required by the loan documents and their rights and powers with respect thereto, lenders should next confirm that borrowers complied with their obligations and have properly maintained the applicable policies.
Lenders with security interests in, or liens on, insurance proceeds should next verify that such interests have been properly perfected.
Lenders should verify the existence and status of any and all claims submitted by borrowers, and establish protocols to ensure up-to-date status reports will be provided in the future. As part of this step, and in order to ensure they have all relevant information before assessing their enforcement options, lenders should remind borrowers of any potentially relevant reporting obligations that may exist in the loan documents, such as when a borrower is confronted with a material change or seeks to assert an insurable loss. Lenders should also verify whether the loan documents limit their rights to contact the insurers directly, and whether the insurance policy entitles lender to receive information directly from the insurer. To the extent direct contact with insurers is permitted, it can be a valuable source of information. However, we recommend that lender not contact the insurance carrier directly unless the borrower and/or insurance carrier have failed to provide required information.
Lenders should verify what enforcement options are available under the circumstances. Do the loan documents call for insurance proceeds to be deposited in an account under lender's control (e.g. through a Deposit Account Control Agreement)? If so, lenders should evaluate whether to apply those funds to the loan balance. Typically, unless a loan is in default, insurance proceeds must be made available for repair – in the case of a casualty loss – or rent replacement – in the case of business interruption insurance. Lenders must also take note of requirements concerning how their interests may be enforced. Are any notices required by the loan documents before the commencement of legal action? Are lenders required to marshal or exhaust other collateral before looking to insurance proceeds for repayment? Not only must lenders comply with contractual requirements, but lenders considering legal action should also account for court closures and delays due to COVID-19 restrictions.
Lenders with security interests in insurance proceeds must take into account the COVID-19 restrictions as well. In states where foreclosure of a lien or security interest is a recognized remedy, lenders should verify whether foreclosure, either judicial or non-judicial, is feasible in light of applicable government restrictions. Are local courts allowing judicial foreclosure actions to be filed? Can non-judicial foreclosure sale procedures be "commercially reasonable" under the UCC or similar state law when a shelter-in-place order is in effect? Where enforcement can only be done through a judgment, are the applicable courts allowing such actions to be filed and, if so, what unusual delays should lenders expect as a result of COVID-19 restrictions? These considerations will vary by jurisdiction, as some local ordinances are stricter than others.
Finally, for loans that are secured by real property in California, lenders must be cognizant of enforcement issues presented by California's anti-deficiency statute and the one-action rule, which limit lenders' enforcement rights. Given the complexity of these statutes, lenders should consult with counsel before taking steps to enforce their rights.
Faced with numerous borrower requests for relief, lenders must arm themselves with a detailed understanding of the assets and resources that may be available to satisfy their loans, including insurance proceeds. Lenders should take action now to determine the scope of, and prepare to enforce, their interests. This checklist provides a starting point for lenders who wish to do so, and Allen Matkins attorneys are available to advise lenders as they determine their rights and assess their options.
Author
Partner
RELATED INDUSTRIES
News & Insights
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. All Rights Reserved.
This publication is made available by Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP for educational purposes only to convey general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this website you acknowledge there is no attorney client relationship between you and Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. This publication should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney applied to your circumstances. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Full Disclaimer