Eminent Domain & Valuation
Allen Matkins represents landlords and tenants in all types of lease disputes, which frequently turn on valuation issues.
We advise and represent clients in matters including:
Working with appraisers we specially choose for their expertise, we are able to establish valuations for a wide variety of properties, including:
These valuations lead to successfully negotiated solutions and, where necessary, successful litigation and arbitration outcomes.
Working with appraisers we specially choose for their expertise, we are able to establish valuations for a wide variety of properties, including:
These valuations lead to successfully negotiated solutions and, where necessary, successful litigation and arbitration outcomes.
Makar Properties v. City of Huntington Beach (Arbitration). Represented developer Makar Properties against the City of Huntington Beach in connection with a dispute regarding the value of Makar's Huntington Beach property. The valuation impacted the eventual park-in-lieu fee Makar would be required to pay. The parties were nearly $50 million apart in their valuation figures. After an arbitration, the three judge panel awarded a value exactly at Makar’s appraisal testimony. This equates to a $20 million savings in park fees for Makar.
Landlord (Orange County, California). Represented an Orange County landowner which leases the land to a business under a long-term lease. Under the lease, our client is entitled to a fair market value rent increase in 2010, the amount of which the parties disputed. The tenant argued a very low value due to the recession, resulting in a small increase. We obtained a high value appraisal and pursued the claim in arbitration. We achieved settlement under which the client receives a 300% rent increase, raising rents to $900,000 per year. In addition, while the lease called for the rent from the 2010 adjustment to be fixed for 10 years, under the settlement the rent will increase 4% each year, compounded annually.
Property Owner. Represented property owner in negotiations/possible inverse condemnation action involving damage caused by stormwater drainage onto client's property from public drains.
Related Services
News & Insights
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. All Rights Reserved.
This publication is made available by Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP for educational purposes only to convey general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this website you acknowledge there is no attorney client relationship between you and Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. This publication should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney applied to your circumstances. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Full Disclaimer