Allen Matkins
ProfessionalsIndustries & ServicesNews & InsightsCareers

  • Professionals
  • Industries & Services
  • News & Insights
  • Careers
  • Offices
  • About
Manage Subscriptions

News & Insights

Legal Alert

California Corporations Commissioner Extends Key Listed Securities Exemptions to NASDAQ Capital Market Issuers

This alert applies to corporations with securities listed on the NASDAQ Capital Market.

Legal Alert

8.25.09

On August 17, 2009, the California Corporations Commissioner certified the NASDAQ Capital Market under two key provisions of the Corporate Securities Law of 1968. These certifications will immediately extend significant legal benefits to companies with securities listed on that market.

Previously, the Nasdaq Stock Market operated as an over-the-counter market and consisted of the Nasdaq National Market and the Nasdaq Capital Market (fka Nasdaq SmallCap Market). On August 1, 2006, the Nasdaq Stock Market began operating as a national securities exchange. At about the same time, the Nasdaq National Market was renamed the NASDAQ Global Market. The NASDAQ Global Market presently consists of two tiers – the NASDAQ Global Market and the NASDAQ Global Select Market.

Securities listed or authorized for listing on the NASDAQ Global Market are "covered securities" under the National Securities Markets Improvement Act (the "NSMIA"). As a result, California and other states cannot impose qualification or registration requirements under their securities or "blue sky" laws. In 2007, the listing standards for the NASDAQ Capital Market were increased and the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") added securities listed or approved for listing on that market to the list of "covered securities" for purposes of the NSMIA.

In general, the offer and sale of securities in California must be qualified with the Commissioner unless an exemption from qualification is available or state regulation has been preempted by federal law such as the NSMIA. Long before Congress preempted state qualification requirements for covered securities, California had exempted securities of companies listed on exchanges certified by the Commissioner pursuant to Corporations Code Section 25100(o). This exemption was from the qualification, but not anti-fraud, provisions of California's securities laws. While Congress' enactment of the NSMIA in 1996 seemed to make this exemption irrelevant, it remained important because it is unclear whether the federal preemption of state qualification requirements pursuant to the NSMIA extends to options, warrants and other rights to acquire a listed security. Because Section 25100(o) also excepts warrants and other rights to acquire a security listed or approved for listing on a certified exchange, the exemption continues to be relevant and important.

Despite the SEC's 2007 decision to extend "covered security" status to NASDAQ Capital Market securities, the Commissioner did not certify that market for purposes of Section 25100(o). This meant that options, warrants and other rights to acquire NASDAQ Capital Market listed securities remained subject to qualification even though the underlying securities were "covered securities". The Commissioner's recent certification of the NASDAQ Capital Market means that companies with securities listed on that market will no longer need to be concerned with qualification in California of options, warrants and other rights to acquire their NASDAQ Capital Market listed securities.

The Commissioner has also certified the NASDAQ Capital Market for purposes of Corporations Code Section 25101(a). That statute provides an exemption from qualification for offers and sales of securities in non-issuer (i.e, secondary) transactions. The exemption is available for any security of a person that is the issuer of a security listed on an exchange certified by the Commissioner. While the preemptive effect of the NSMIA obviates the need for this exemption in the case of "covered securities" (or equal or senior securities), the exemption has some residual utility because it covers not just the covered security (or an equal or senior security) but any security issued by a person that is the issuer of a security listed on a certified exchange.

The Commissioner's certification of the NASDAQ Capital Market will provide a non-securities law benefit to NASDAQ Capital Market companies as well. California has constitutional usury limitations. Pursuant to Corporations Code Section 25117(a), evidences of indebtedness and the purchasers or holders thereof are exempt if the issuer has any security listed or approved for listing on a national securities exchange certified by the Commissioner under Section 25100(o). The Commissioner's certification should therefore make it easier for smaller publicly traded companies to issue debt without concern for California's constitutional usury limits.

If you are interested in learning more about the consequences of the Commissioner's certifications of the NASDAQ Capital Market, please call any member of the Allen Matkins Corporate Group

SUBSCRIBE

Author

Keith P. Bishop

Partner

Orange CountyT(949) 851-5428kbishop@allenmatkins.com
Email Keith P. Bishop
Download Keith P. Bishop Vcard
Keith P. Bishop LinkedIn

RELATED SERVICES

  • Corporate & Finance

News & Insights

Manage Subscriptions

Legal Alert

FinCEN’s Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Requirements Are Now In Effect

1.04.24

Event

2023 Annual Corporate & LLC Update

11.16.23

Legal Alert

New SEC Rules Will Increase the Regulation of Private Fund Advisers

8.31.23

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins Expands Corporate Group with Addition of Partner Peter R. Fischer

8.21.23

Legal Alert

FinCEN Exempts U.S. Companies and U.S. Persons from Beneficial Ownership Reporting Requirements

3.28.25

Legal Alert

Updated Guidance on the Corporate Transparency Act and Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Requirements

2.24.25

Corporate Conference room with black chairs

Legal Alert

Update: CTA’s Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Requirements Back On Hold; Nationwide Injunction Reinstated Following Order by Fifth Circuit Merits Panel

12.30.24

Legal Alert

Updates to the Corporate Transparency Act's Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Requirements

12.24.24

Press, Media, & Articles

$345 Million Legal Bill in Tesla Case Shows Need for Tort Reform

12.23.24

Press, Media, & Articles

Peter Fischer and Max Rawn Named as Top 15 Corporate Attorneys

12.18.24

Corporate Conference room with black chairs

Legal Alert

How to Prepare for the Upcoming Filing Deadline Under the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA)

11.19.24

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins Continues Growth in New York Office with Tax Partner Hire

11.18.24

Press, Media, & Articles

Real Estate Debt Managers Score Fundraising Jump: Prequin

8.01.24

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins Advises Sentinel Net Lease in First Acquisition for Sentinel Opportunity Fund I

6.28.24

Corporate Conference room with black chairs

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins Partner Recognized Among Top 100 Lawyers in Los Angeles

4.22.24

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins Advises Revitate in Portland Thorns FC Acquisition

1.18.24

Legal Alert

FinCEN’s Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Requirements Are Now In Effect

1.04.24

Event

2023 Annual Corporate & LLC Update

11.16.23

Legal Alert

New SEC Rules Will Increase the Regulation of Private Fund Advisers

8.31.23

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins Expands Corporate Group with Addition of Partner Peter R. Fischer

8.21.23

Legal Alert

FinCEN Exempts U.S. Companies and U.S. Persons from Beneficial Ownership Reporting Requirements

3.28.25

Legal Alert

Updated Guidance on the Corporate Transparency Act and Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Requirements

2.24.25

Corporate Conference room with black chairs

Legal Alert

Update: CTA’s Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Requirements Back On Hold; Nationwide Injunction Reinstated Following Order by Fifth Circuit Merits Panel

12.30.24

Legal Alert

Updates to the Corporate Transparency Act's Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Requirements

12.24.24

Press, Media, & Articles

$345 Million Legal Bill in Tesla Case Shows Need for Tort Reform

12.23.24

Press, Media, & Articles

Peter Fischer and Max Rawn Named as Top 15 Corporate Attorneys

12.18.24

Corporate Conference room with black chairs

Legal Alert

How to Prepare for the Upcoming Filing Deadline Under the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA)

11.19.24

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins Continues Growth in New York Office with Tax Partner Hire

11.18.24

Press, Media, & Articles

Real Estate Debt Managers Score Fundraising Jump: Prequin

8.01.24

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins Advises Sentinel Net Lease in First Acquisition for Sentinel Opportunity Fund I

6.28.24

Corporate Conference room with black chairs

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins Partner Recognized Among Top 100 Lawyers in Los Angeles

4.22.24

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins Advises Revitate in Portland Thorns FC Acquisition

1.18.24

Legal Alert

FinCEN’s Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Requirements Are Now In Effect

1.04.24

Event

2023 Annual Corporate & LLC Update

11.16.23

Legal Alert

New SEC Rules Will Increase the Regulation of Private Fund Advisers

8.31.23

Press, Media, & Articles

Allen Matkins Expands Corporate Group with Addition of Partner Peter R. Fischer

8.21.23

View All
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Request Personal Data Information

Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Facebook
LinkedIn
Twitter
Instagram

This publication is made available by Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP for educational purposes only to convey general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this website you acknowledge there is no attorney client relationship between you and Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP. This publication should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney applied to your circumstances. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Full Disclaimer