$345 Million Legal Bill in Tesla Case Shows Need for Tort Reform

Partner Keith Bishop was quoted in the DC Journal in an article regarding a Delaware judge who invalidated Tesla's compensation package for CEO Elon Musk, awarding $345 million in legal fees to the plaintiff's attorneys. The lawsuit was initiated by Richard Tornetta, a Pennsylvania resident holding nine Tesla shares, who contended that Musk had excessive influence over the company's executives. This substantial legal fee has sparked discussions about tort reform, with critics arguing that such awards may not serve the best interests of shareholders. Bishop questioned the fairness of a single judge overturning the decisions of both directors and shareholders, expressing skepticism about the benefit of the $345 million fee to Tesla and its investors in his blog, the California Corporate & Securities Law Blog. The case has intensified calls for nationwide tort reform to address escalating legal costs and their impact on businesses.

Read the full article here.